Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

screws in combination with angular stable plates enable fracture

fixation in a conventional way and allow in-situ augmentation of the

screws with polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cement (Figure 1b).

In a biomechanical in-vitro study, the effect of in-situ augmentation

on implant anchorage was investigated in a three part fracture model

[23]. Fracture fixation was carried out using an angularly stable plate

and cannulated screws to allow for the augmentation of the proximal

screws with 0.5 ml of PMMA cement. Paired humeri (control and

augmented) with reduced bone quality were used for two differently

simulated loads (torsion and varus bending). Cyclic loading, with a

constantly increasing load magnitude, to implant fixation failure was

applied in both loading conditions. Compared to the contralateral

control group, augmentation resulted in a significantly increased

number of load cycles and failure for varus bending and torsional

loading. While implant anchorage showed a strong correlation with

bone quality in the control group, the augmented group showed no

correlation between implant anchorage and bone quality. However, it

was shown that the improvement of implant anchorage by augmen-

tation (difference between control and augmentation) correlated with

bone quality, and augmentation was most effective in low bone quality

and negligibly effective in good bone quality (Figure 2).

Due to a non-uniform distribution of bone quality in the humeral

head, investigators still debate which and how many screws are most

beneficial for augmentation. In order to determine which screws had

the least purchase and would benefit the most from augmentation, a

study was performed evaluating the local bone quality in the humeral

head by measuring the breakaway torque at the screw tip [24]. The

screws in the anteromedial and anteroinferior aspects of the humeral

head showed the lowest breakaway torques and were selected for

augmentation with 0.5 ml of PMMA cement. Using a similar test setup

for varus bending, the effect of in-situ augmentation of two screws

with the lowest breakaway torque achieved almost the same stability

as augmentation of the four most proximal screws.

Augmentation techniques for hip fractures

According to epidemiologic data, there is an increasing incidence of

hip fractures, with an estimated 1.7 million fractures worldwide per

year in 1990 to an expected number of 6.3 million per year in 2050 [25].

Given the importance of maintaining function and independence in

the geriatric patient population, the use of PMMA for augmentation of

fixation in hip fractures is of growing. The use of bone cement

augmentation has been reported for plate, screw, and nail osteosynth-

esis in elderly patients [26,27], demonstrating increased bone-implant

interface, improved implant anchorage, reduced screw cut-out, and

improved early full-weight bearing [26,28]. The treatment of trochan-

teric fractures with a DHS (Dynamic Hip Screw) augmented with

PMMA or a resorbable bone cement based on calcium phosphate has

shown greater biomechanical strength, faster pain reduction, and

improved healing compared to a control group [27].

In a clinical prospective study of 64 patients with 31-A2 and 31-A3

fractures of the proximal femur, treatment with a PMMA-augmented

DHS showed good fracture consolidation without any adverse

complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head [29].

However, intramedullary nailing was associated with improved

biomechanical stability relative to extramedullary fixation techniques

Fig. 1.

Pre- and post-operative radiographs after operative treatment using different augmentation techniques. (a) vertebral fracture treated with PMMA kyphoplasty; (b) prox-

imal humerus fracture treated with a PMMA augmented plate osteosynthesis (PHILOS ®); (c) proximal tibia fracture treated with internal fixation after filling of the subchondral

void with calcium-phosphate cement; (d) trochanteric fracture treated with a PMMA augmented PFNA (Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation, Fa. Synthes).

C. Kammerlander et al. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47S2 (2016) S36

S43

S38