Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Although the crucial role of cortical bone for the mechanical

competence of bone and the risk of fracture has been recognized it has

not really been transferred to clinical practice for fracture risk

assessment or for monitoring of osteoporosis treatment. Future clinical

imaging techniques will have to consider measures cortical bone

geometrical features and also its local porosity.

The role of collagen

The matrix of bone is composed of both inorganic (i.e. mineral) and

organic (i.e. water, collagen, and non-collagenous proteins) compo-

nents. The role of mineral composition in skeletal fragility has been

studied in depth, and it is generally understood that in normal bone,

the mineral content provides strength and stiffness [81]. There is less

known about the effect of collagen and non-collagenous proteins, but

there is increasing evidence suggesting that changes in protein content

and structure play important roles in age- and disease-related changes

in bone. In particular, the organic matrix is considered to be

responsible for bone

s ductility and its ability to absorb energy prior

to fracturing [82].

Ninety percent of bone

s organic matrix is composed of type I

collagen, a structural protein comprised of three polypeptide chains

with a defined amino acid sequence, glycine-X-hydroxyproline or

glycine-proline-X (X is an amino acid such as lysine). This particular

sequence of amino acids allows the polypeptide chains to twist into a

triple helical structure with the small glycine in the middle, and amino

acids that remain exposed on the surface of the triple helix are involved

in the formation of collagen crosslinks [83]. Collagen undergoes

numerous post-translational modifications with aging and disease,

including both enzymatic and non-enzymatic crosslinking. In general,

enzymatic crosslinking is considered to be a normal process for healthy

collagen and has a beneficial effect on its mechanical properties, while

non-enzymatic crosslinking results in a brittle collagen network that

leads to deteriorated bone mechanical properties if its accumulation

exceeds normal repair [84].

Enzymatic crosslinking requires the enzyme lysyl oxidase to aid

the formation of intra- or inter-fibrillar crosslinks such as pyridinoline

and deoxypyridinoline [85]. The lysine-based crosslinks form in the

overlap regions of fibrils in a head-to-tail fashion (Figure 8) [86]. In

the maturation process, bivalent crosslinks slowly transform into a

more stable, trivalent, non-reducible conformation. Mature crosslinks

accumulate, inhibit collagen fibril remodeling, increase the stiffness of

the fibril, and provide increased strength to the tissue [86,87].

Pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline serve as markers of bone resorp-

tion and are indicators of collagen maturity [88]. Enzymatic crosslinks

are most reliably quantified and characterized with mass spectrometry

[89] or HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography) [90], but some

studies indicate that FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) spectroscopy can

illustrate collagen crosslink characteristics [91]. Using these methods,

enzymatic crosslinks have been shown to be reduced in osteoporotic

patients with hip fractures compared to healthy controls [92,93].

The second pathway for collagen crosslinking does not involve any

enzymes, and is termed non-enzymatic glycation. Unlike the enzym-

atic crosslinks, which link the ends of the collagen molecules, non-

enzymatic crosslinks are found at any position along the collagen.

Non-enzymatic glycation involves a reaction between an aldehyde

group of a sugar (e.g. glucose) and the

ε

-amino group of hydroxylysine

or lysine. This reaction results in the formation of glucosyl-lysine,

which undergoes further reactions to form an Amadori product or

Schiff base adduct. Both of these intermediate products undergo

additional reactions to create crosslinks that form within and across

collagen fibers and are known as advanced glycation end-products

(AGEs) [86], which have been shown to accumulate in numerous

tissues including skin, cartilage, tendons, and bone [94]. AGEs

accumulate with age and disease [85]. Specifically, osteoporotic bone

has significantly more AGEs than normal healthy bone [92,93]. The

increased AGE levels can result in brittleness of tissues undergoing

non-enzymatic glycation [95].

There are two methods used for quantifying AGEs in bone, and

these techniques incorporate measurement of the autofluorescence

emitted by most AGEs. One technique quantifies pentosidine, a single

AGE crosslink and the only non-enzymatic crosslink that has been

successfully isolated and quantified in bone, using HPLC [96]. As

pentosidine composes less than 1% of total fluorescent AGEs in bone

and is weakly correlated to the amount of total fluorescent AGEs in

human bone [83,97], it is valuable to measure total fluorescent AGEs in

addition to pentosidine content. The second technique quantifies the

bulk fluorescence of AGEs from enzyme-digested or acid-hydrolyzed

bone samples relative to a quinine sulfate standard [98], and the

amount of fluorescence is normalized to collagen content.

Wavelengths used in this fluorometric assay capture the excitation

and emission wavelengths of several major AGE crosslinks including

pentosidine, carboxymethyllysine, vesperlysines, crossline, and car-

boxyethyllysine [83], and thus, the relative contributions of each of

these crosslinks to the total fluorescence cannot be determined from

this assay.

Increased non-enzymatic glycation has been shown to reduce

mechanical strength and/or toughness of bone [99,100]. Glycation

levels have also been shown to be greater in cadaver specimens from

hip fracture patients compared to controls, and the glycation content

was correlated with several biomechanical properties in cancellous

bone, but

not

in cortical bone [92,93]. Although it is generally

understood that AGEs accumulate in bone, stiffen the collagen

matrix, and in turn, deteriorate bone

s mechanical properties, the

contradictions in current literature arise for a number of reasons: (1)

few

in vitro

glycation studies have been conducted, and most

in vitro

studies have been primarily conducted in cancellous bone, (2) studies

conducted on

in vivo

glycation levels report pentosidine content only

while a few studies report total AGEs, making the studies difficult to

compare, (3) range of values for glycation levels reported vary greatly

depending on the bone, location, and age range of specimens used, and

(4) various mechanical testing techniques, animal models, or disease

states have been used in these studies. Thus, the exact contribution of

AGEs to age-related skeletal fragility remains undefined.

There is increasing evidence that AGEs directly affect cellular

function through the receptor for AGE (RAGE), a surface receptor on

many cell types [101]. RAGE activation is associatedwith inflammation,

cellular dysfunction, and localized tissue destruction. In bone,

activation of the RAGE receptor inhibits osteoblast proliferation and

differentiation [102], reduces matrix production [103], reduces bone

formation [104] and increases osteoblast apoptosis [105]. This

indicates that crosslinking properties of the matrix not only alter the

tissue properties, but directly control cellular function and may play

an important role in the decreased bone formation found in

osteoporosis [106].

In addition to enzymatic and non-enzymatic modifications of

collagen, non-collagenous proteins (e.g. osteopontin, osteocalcin),

Fig. 8. Collagen cross-links

A schematic illustration of enzymatic crosslinks (e.g. pyr-

idinoline [PYD], deoxypyridinoline [DPD]) and non-enzymatic crosslinks (e.g. pento-

sidine [PEN]) at the molecular level.

G. Osterhoff et al. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47S2 (2016) S11

S20

S17